Jan. 17, 2000

Parents of the Disabled Find Little Relief.

By Anita Manning, USA TODAY

Donna Guyton remembers the last time her son Patrick spoke.

He said, "Daddy, take me home." It was 3:30 on a June morning in 1990, in the Nashville hospital where Guyton and her husband, Michael, had brought their son hours earlier.

A bright, active and happy little boy, Patrick, then 4, had viral encephalitis. It started with a mild fever. In a matter of days, he was blind and unable to speak, walk, sit up, or take food or fluids by mouth.

"One day you're a functioning family, and the next day your life is turned upside down," Donna Guyton says.

For nearly a decade, Patrick has required relentless medical attention and daily care, including feeding, diapering and lifting from bed to chair. He weighs 90 pounds and is 5-foot-1, just 2 inches shorter than his mother.

The strain of caring for a medically fragile child with multiple disabilities is beyond the imagination of most parents of healthy children, and, until recently, many simply never thought about it.

But on the day after Christmas, when a Pennsylvania couple, Richard and Dawn Kelso, left their disabled son at a Delaware children's hospital with a note saying they could no longer care for him, the long-ignored problems of parents struggling to raise children with special needs was brought to the forefront of public consciousness.

In letters to newspapers and on radio talk shows, the Kelsos were criticized for "abandoning" their 10-year-old boy. The Kelsos haven't spoken publicly, but parents with a unique understanding of the couple's dilemma soon began to speak up.

"We know what it is like to walk in the shoes of the Kelso parents," says Bruce MacKenzie of Santa Barbara, Calif., whose 18-year-old daughter, Elizabeth, was born with cerebral palsy and epilepsy. Critics "haven't the slightest idea what it is like to nurse a child with severe medical needs 24 hours a day, seven days a week."

MacKenzie's wife, Louise Talarico MacKenzie, says that giving up on a dependent child is "unthinkable," but "caregiving of this magnitude that lasts for years can become unbearable. Without support that is flexible and responsive to the individual and to the family, it is really a matter of time until giving over the responsibility to someone else happens."

Donna Guyton sympathizes. "I can understand what happened with that family," she says of the Kelsos. "Instead of people judging, they should look at what support needs to be out there to keep families together, to support health-care needs at home."

Compared with many families, the Guytons are lucky. Donna is a nurse, and Michael, an actuary, has a good job and medical insurance.

After fighting their way through a morass of government and insurance regulations, they managed to get Patrick qualified for a federal Medicaid waiver that pays for 30 hours a week of nursing assistance. "Any time you have a special-needs child," Michael Guyton says, "you have to fight with the agencies, fight with the insurance companies. It's exhausting."

Sometimes, especially during the winter holidays, "you just can't find people to come," he says, and even when nurses are available, there is little consistency because of the high turnover. Patrick had 28 nurses in one seven-month period, Guyton says. "When we have a new nurse, it takes days to get her so she knows how to take care of him."

On the occasions when they can leave the house to take their younger son, Peter, 10, to dinner or to his basketball practice or Bible class, the Guytons wear beepers. They're always on call.

The never-ending responsibility is one of the things that gets to Stacie Payne of Plano, Texas. She and husband J.D. have three children: Jessica, 15, Clinton, 12, and Taylor, 9.

Clinton has autism "on the severe end of the scale," Stacie Payne says. "He doesn't talk. He doesn't have any stable form of communication. . . . He has to take our hand and bring us to the pantry. We open it. Is this what you want? Is this what you want? That's life for him and for us."

She sounds tired. "We do just about everything for him," she says. "We feed him, bathe him, brush his teeth, change him when he has an accident. He does eat finger food by himself, but that's it. A lot of it is his behavior. It's unfortunate they don't know more about autism than they do."

The Paynes have no relatives nearby to help, and J.D.'s job can take him away from home for two months at a stretch. "I hear people tell me all the time, 'I don't know how you do it. You're so patient.' I'm thinking, 'If you only knew .' They only have a glimpse; they don't know what it can be like to have this in your life 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is very stressful. I can't say I haven't had thoughts - I've never gone so far as to think, 'This is it, I can't do this anymore,' - but there are times when you think, 'God, what else can I do? I'm hanging here at the end of my rope.' But we always manage to pull through."

The pressure often fractures marriages and drains parents, leaving little energy for anything else.

"I have seen too often two very nice people who got married and expected to live together forever. Then they have a child with disabilities," says Maxwell Schleifer, editor in chief of Exceptional Parent, a monthly magazine on parenting a child with a disability or special health needs. "They work exceptionally hard to care for the child and the rest of the family. Everybody is working too hard, and five years down the line, they find the marriage no longer exists. "

Lack of control over the child's care is one of the biggest stress-inducers, says Jackie Golden of the National Parent Network on Disabilities, whose 18-year-old son has a disorder called Angelman's syndrome, which causes mental retardation and other problems. In many states, even when insurance will pay for nurses to provide respite for overworked parents, an agency, not the parents, chooses the nurses, she says. "You have no control over the people who come into your home."

Payne has encountered the same problem. A local agency sends "people out to watch the kids, so you have some time out. The only thing bad is they're pretty unreliable. The people working there are not well educated in working with someone like Clinton, so they don't know what to do," she says. "They won't let you hire who you want. And when you get a different lady every time, it's hard to leave. With autism, they like the sameness, they have a routine. When you have somebody new, it throws things off. Nine times out of 10, we get paged an hour after we've left."

A good family income is no guarantee of better care, Golden says.

"If you have an income, your finances are depleted quickly" by expensive medical equipment, special feeding formulas and other items not covered by insurance. It's not unusual to spend $20,000 a year out of pocket, parents say.

While there are state social services, Golden says, "if you're middle-class and higher, you can forget it. You don't qualify for anything."

Creative solutions are needed, she says. One example is a "self-determination" approach, a concept developed by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which encourages states to turn over control of the support system for people with disabilities to themselves and their families. So far, 39 states, including Maryland, where Golden lives, have adopted such plans. Golden and her husband have a care plan for their son that is tailored to his needs, and they have chosen the staff to give him round-the-clock care at home. And, she says, it costs $25,000 a year less than it did to keep him in an institution.

Medical systems, Schleifer says, are not set up to deal with the realities of caring for disabled children in this age of medical advances. "Because we do more (medically) and kids live longer, no matter what insurance you have, you run out of it," he says. "Years ago, the child was institutionalized, or he died. Nobody planned for the consequences of living longer or for active inclusion."

Yet, he says, "we do better than any country in the world. We're light-years from where we were and light-years from where we're going. It's important to remember both."

Meanwhile, Donna and Michael Guyton work to make life as full and happy as possible for their two boys. They take pleasure in each child's victories - Peter's good grades and an award recently won at school, Patrick's recently acquired skills of grasping an object and being able to take food and water by mouth.

"We're Catholic, and our faith is very important to us," Donna Guyton says. Patrick "goes to church every Sunday with us."

"This is the year he would be making confirmation, so my husband takes him every Sunday night to confirmation class. He seems to perk up when he hears children's voices, so the stimulation (at church) is wonderful for him. We're not sure what he's able to understand, but it's important to give him those opportunities, and also it touches other people's lives to see him. People have said it makes them hug their children more." And that's good, she says.

"Tomorrow is not guaranteed to any of us."

Return to Projects and Informational Materials